As a result of the EP’s LIBE committee report on the EU Copyright Regulation, in Feb 2015, I built a Storify page and propose to write a blog article. This page captures some of the resources I used to write it. They come from my blog, the IP Kat, out-law.com, torrentfreak and flickr, where martin Fisch’s picture is embedded in the text and used as a featured image. Continue reading “On Copyright”
I was point at a Parliament TV clip from the House of Commons and wanted to experiment with using the stop parameter. The http code is as follows, Continue reading “Parliament TV”
I have posted and try to maintain the most recent copy of the Labour Party Rule Book that I can find, this is also hidden in member’s net; this latter link requires a login and the search engines have difficulty in finding it.
I have also created a bit.ly short name for the LP’s version, bit.ly/uklabourrules17. This copy of the rules is the 2017 rules, presumably authorised by lab16. Hover over the links to see the tool tips. Continue reading “Labour’s Rule Book”
I was pointed at, The Norwegian trial with Internet voting: results and challenges by an attendee at 31C3. The summary states there is no evidence that it increases turnout and concludes, Continue reading “More research on e-voting”
The politics of cross thames planning is heating up, here are some links, Continue reading “Crossing the Thames”
A meeting of Labour Friends of the ORG was held at ORGcon yesterday, where Claude Moraes MEP spoke, we agreed to try and stay in touch, initially via Google Groups. The google group is called Labour Friends of the ORG and Continue reading “Labour Friends of the ORG (rebooted)”
Estonia is becoming the touchstone and proof of good e-voting practice. It has failed its audits in the last elections. Continue reading “Estonia e-voting”
For some time, social and political scientests have suggested that political views usually charcterised as a left right sepctrum is also influenced by a tough/tender or libertarian/authoritarian spectrum. This often called the political compass and a site of the same name is here, http://www.politicalcompass.org/. Continue reading “Political Compass”
This source is labeld check against delivery.
Yvette Cooper speech to Demos in March 2014 here, from Labour Press’ tumblr account.
- does she mention court secrecy? No.
- she doesn’t address the potential need for two agencies one for spying and one for defending UK cyberspace
- no mention of copyright crime which is good, most people will allow greater compromises in privacy to prosecute and prevent terrorism and child abuse, and they’d put their bank accounts before the copyright holders interests.
- No mention of the fact that the NSA and thus the US Government are a threat to ecommerce
- No mention of national security of supply
it’s clearly aimed at fighting terrorism, child abuse and defending the ecommerce infrastructure
At the same time the Prime Minister has also said that GCHQ and the NSA can do more to tackle child pornography on the dark net, to “decrypt encrypted files, and… find out what is going on”. A new strategy is needed to make sure the fight against online child abuse can keep up with new technology – including looking at the legal framework, resources, structures and the role for the private sector and internet service providers to do more.
Cameron’s been watching CSIcyber again, but Yvette’s response is reasoned
The summary reseats the speech in the legal powers and supervison policy domain.
I rather like this,
The digital age generates every second new and amazing opportunities that we should seize. But we cannot duck our responsibilities to face up to the difficult challenges it poses too – to make sure that the digital age serves the public and our democracy, and not the other way round.
What I plan to say on the Euro Husting blog article, which picks up the press articles, Guardian and Register
… pointed to Yvette Cooper’s speech to Demos on the balance between security and privacy in the internet age. I have to say, I missed this when it was reported by the Guardian, and would have been unsurprised by the Register’s hostile headline but we can read the speech for ourselves here. Id’ say it’s better than its critics suggest; there’s a growing consensus that RIPA gets it wrong and the recognition that privacy is part of the balance is a better position than the Tories and spies take and that many had expected from the Labour Front bench.
The NPF’s programme only mentions the digital economy once, and this is to promise more speed, everywhere it can go. There are two internal pressure group style swarms/groups/initiatives. Continue reading “Planning Labour’s Digital Manifesto”
I returned to this in March as the Mayor sought comments in the final stage of consultation before agreeing or rejecting outline planning permission. New Cross Labour have published Joan Ruddock’s submission on their web site, here. She is arguing for the cultural planning gain represented by the Sayes Court Garden project and the Build the Lenox project. 20 March 2014
Previously I was working my way through the Officers report to Lewisham’s strategic planning committee which rejected the plan as it now stands on six grounds. Continue reading “Convoy’s Wharf”
I chose to embed a parliamentary video cast in one of my blog articles and this is the agreement required before it can be embedded. I can’t find a link, otherwise I’d do so. This was created in Dec 2013.
UK Parliament permits you to embed its video and audio material on your website as long as you agree to various conditions (see below). Please note:
- This is for use on not for profit websites
- Only the supplied code can be used
- The video or audio of the recordings cannot be edited in any way.
- UK Parliament can remove the recording without notice
- UK Parliament makes this recording available at your own risk
- The Recordings cannot be placed on sites that contain illegal or offensive material
- The Recordings cannot be placed on certain sites that contain advertising
- The embedding of UK Parliament recordings is not a UK Parliament endorsement of your website
UK Parliament Embedded Recording Licence Terms
By embedding UK Parliament Recordings on your website (“Site”) you agree to the terms set out below.
- 1.1 Subject to these Licence Terms UK Parliament grants you a non-exclusive licence to display on your Site recordings of UK Parliament Proceedings.
- 1.2 All rights including intellectual property rights shall remain the property and copyright of UK Parliament.
2. Use of UK Parliament Recordings
- 2.1 You may only embed UK Parliament Recordings on websites that are not excluded by UK Parliament. The categories of website that are excluded are set out below. Sites that:
- Advertise or Promote Commercial activity
- Promote, encourage or facilitate illegal activity
- Encourage hatred on grounds of race, religion, gender, disability, age or sexual orientation or promote, encourage or facilitate anti-social behaviour
- Lower the dignity of either House or that of individual members.
- 2.2 Unless expressly permitted by UK Parliament in writing, the recordings are for not for profit use only and may not be used for corporate, commercial or professional purposes. Whilst you may use the recording on an ad-enabled blog or website, you may not charge users to view the recording.
- 2.3 There should be no advertising displayed on the same screen as the embedded video recording comprising the Services where that video recording represents the majority of the content on any page of the website or where the page would not exist without the video recording. In other cases, advertising may be permitted, but not where there is any connection between the advertising and the video recording;
- 2.4 You may not alter or add to the UK Parliament Recording in any way, nor combine the UK Parliament Recording with any other material.
- 2.5 You may not suggest any endorsement or approval by the UK Parliament or any individual Member of your Site
- 2.6 You may not use the UK Parliament Recordings in any way that could bring the UK Parliament or any individual Member into disrepute.
- 2.7 You accept and agree that UK Parliament has sole editorial control over all UK Parliament Recordings at all times and it may change or remove any recording at its sole discretion.
3. Warranties & Liability
- 3.1 You warrant that your Site fully complies with all applicable laws and regulations.
- 3.2 The UK Parliament Recordings are made available on an “as is” and “as available” basis and UK Parliament gives no warranty of any kind in relation to the availability and use of the Recordings
- 3.3 The UK Parliament has taken reasonable care to ensure that the recording and any related software code contains no errors, viruses or defects, however UK Parliament does not warrant that this is the case. You use the UK Parliament recording at your own discretion and risk and you are advised to take all reasonable precautions to protect your computer from virus infection.
- 3.4 UK Parliament will not be liable for any loss or damage which you may suffer as a result of, or connected to your use of the UK Parliament recording.
- 3.5 Each provision of this Clause 3 operates separately in itself and survives independently of the others.
- 4.1 In the event that a third party commences legal proceedings against the UK Parliament as a result of your use of the UK Parliament Recording in breach of these Licence Terms you agree to indemnify UK Parliament in respect of any and all damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable legal fees and litigation expenses, UK Parliament suffers or incurs as a result of such action.
- 5.1 The UK Parliament may restrict, suspend or terminate any or all UK Parliament recordings or your access to the recordings at any time at its sole discretion without liability.
- 5.2 Clauses 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall survive termination of this Agreement.
- 6.1 You may not transfer or sublicense any of your rights or obligations under the Licence Terms to any third party.
- 6.2 This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with English Law and subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts of England and Wales
- 6.3 Any failure or delay by the UK Parliament in exercising its rights under these Licence Terms shall not be construed as a waiver of those rights.
I needed to research the Lavabits closure story and I found these links; Continue reading “Lavabits and its closure”
Decided to try and draw a graph of the Labour Party’s membership over time, not as easy as you might think. Here are some links I found that might help me,
- Wikipedia, Labour Party #membership
- Electoral Commission, Party & Election Finance Registers
- Electoral Commission, Party & Election Finance Search
If i get some good data, maybe I’ll publish at Wikipedia.